Blog from the ecovillage/Blag ón eiceaphobal

As we enter the last days of Election 2016, it is already clear that Irish politics is entering a new era no matter what voters decide next Friday. Not only has the campaign failed to ignite idealism and vision, but all the main parties seem to have badly misjudged the public mood. No matter who wins, all emerge as losers.

As different opinion polls show slight swings both up and down for each the four main parties, none of them has managed to make any decisive impact on voting intentions. So, it appears that many voters are left with a decision between the least worst option as they see it, possibly swayed more by fears than by hopes.

This election, then, marks a failure not just of different party campaigns but of the whole political system, unable to understand an electorate that wants a lot more from its politicians than they seem able to offer. In offering nothing more than a spate of confusing promises about taxes and subsidies, reliefs and abolishing charges, all the main parties are seriously misunderstanding the level of knowledge, the real concerns and the public values of most citizens.

It seems doubly ironic that just as we are involved in a public conversation about the ideals of 1916 and what kind of society its participants aspired to, our political parties have been so deaf to the deeper questions raised by the centenary celebrations. How revealing of the paucity of social vision of our political class!

Read more: Election 2016: Is a new ‘demos’ being born?

Never has the commonplace assertion that Irish politics lacks a left-right divide been more true that in election 2016. Indeed, the campaign so far has been characterised by a complete absence of political ideology which has been replaced by an obsessive attention to technical details.

All the main parties are focusing on a complex mixture of how much they will cut taxes and how they will spend the estimated surplus (the dreaded ‘fiscal space’) to the extent that the average person must end up completely confused about what it will all mean for their income.

At best, most people would...

Read more: Election 2016: Are we all neo-liberals now?

About the one certainty we can take from the first days of election 2016 is that it is far from being a coronation of Enda Kenny and Fine Gael. Already under pressure from the virtually meaningless concept of ‘fiscal space’, the Irish Times opinion poll showing a drop in the party’s support set the entirely wrong mood music for the party. It all serves to enhance the spectacle of politics as spectator sport.

Nothing happened in the early days of the campaign to suggest that there is anything serious happening here, apart from the likelihood that we will see at...

Read more: Election 2016: Trading on ignorance and make-believe

The results of yesterday’s Spanish elections leave politics there in a completely new situation with no clear government on offer, but they also mark the breakthrough of a new left party into mainstream politics in a European country with Podemos defying the pollsters and getting more than 20 per cent of the vote.

The final count shows the outgoing right-wing Partido Popular with 123 seats, having lost a third of its seats but still coming in as the largest party. The socialist PSOE also had the worst election since the return to democracy in 1978 winning only 90 seats, down...

Read more: Spain's election: Is a new political force born for Europe?

Amid the widespread welcome for the Paris Agreement, what is striking is the lack of consensus on just how significant it all is. James Hansen, former head of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York and regarded as one of the world’s most eminent climate scientists, went so far as to call it ‘a fraud, a fake, worthless words’ while Cara Augustenborg, chair of Friends of the Earth Ireland, said in Paris that ‘the gap between ambition and action in the deal is too big.’ So should we welcome or denounce this long-awaited global treaty?

The Agreement...

Read more: The Paris Agreement: a major step forward or ‘worthless words’?